nanog mailing list archives
Re: address spoofing
From: Bryan Bradsby <Bryan.Bradsby () capnet state tx us>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 14:39:00 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Greg A. Woods wrote:
Perhaps router vendors can figure out some way to ensure that all packets generated by a router get a unique, valid, non-RFC1918 number when they would otherwise have used an RFC1918 number. Maybe people who think they need to use RFC1918 should instead just hide all their internal crap in a big ATM or FR cloud.
Our routers have been assigned IP numbers from our CIDR blocks for some time now. We are considering assigning IPs for router interfaces from our allocated swamp, broken up into numerous small /30 subnets (or similar). Any comments on this practice? Your good net neighbor, -bryan
Current thread:
- Re: address spoofing, (continued)
- Re: address spoofing Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Dan Hollis (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Alex Bligh (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phillip Vandry (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Bryan Bradsby (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 25)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 25)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 25)
- RE: address spoofing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Apr 26)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 24)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 25)
- Re: address spoofing alex (Apr 25)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 25)