nanog mailing list archives
Re: address spoofing
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
on a router that's not doing filtering, it's going to be a small hit. i'm going to infer, however, that any router that's not doing filtering is probably not doing much traffic. and any router that is doing a lot of traffic, is already doing filtering. so it's less of a hit.
huh? for packet filtering, which is what we've been discussing, my experience is quite the opposite. one can't really afford packet filters on routers with oc12s. and in a multi-path universe, filtering for source address spoofing is best done at the edges anyway. randy
Current thread:
- Re: address spoofing, (continued)
- Re: address spoofing Simon Leinen (Apr 27)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing John Leong (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing bmanning (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Dan Hollis (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phillip Vandry (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Bryan Bradsby (Apr 23)