nanog mailing list archives
Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS?
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 21:38:57 -0500
Thanks to everyone who posted messages and/or sent me private mail on this issue. It has been resolved, and the information gathered here helped a great deal. We ultimately got a conference call today with an NOC engineer from the provider upstream of the net, and a fellow at the ANS NOC, and got the route added in. The fellow from ANS indicated the routes are picked up on Wednesday (not sure what time) for the Thursday update, and on Sunday for the Tuesday update. It's possible the RADB update for this prefix, which was made Wednesday, occurred after ANS had pulled the data. This is all second-hand, though. Perhaps someone from ANS will confirm or deny... Dan -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts () senie com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranthnetworks.com
Current thread:
- IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? jprovo (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Jon Lewis (Nov 09)
- IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Jared Mauch (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Gerald Andrew Winters (Nov 10)