nanog mailing list archives
Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS?
From: jprovo () ma ultranet com
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 07:18:43 -0500 (EST)
[snip]
I've got a number of other nets to be moved shortly, so I'd really like to be clear on how this works. It appears that very few nets rely on the data in the RADB, or take updated data from the RADB in near-real-time fashion.
When last I dealt with this matter (96), ANS happily listens to minor IRR policy stuff in a timely (hours?) fashion, but still manually configured what they considered a "move" from AS to AS. They appeared -at that time- to consider adding sessions to an AS with which they have direct sessions a "move" and updating the IRR was insufficeint. I had hoped that went away with "advisory" lines. Maybe someone at ANS would like to comment about the current implementation? Cheers, -- Joe Provo, Network Architect 508.229.8400 x3006 Commercial Internet Services Group Fax 508.229.2375 UltraNet Communications, Inc., an RCN Company <jprovo () ultra net>
Current thread:
- IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? jprovo (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Jon Lewis (Nov 09)
- IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Daniel Senie (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Jared Mauch (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)
- Re: IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS? Gerald Andrew Winters (Nov 10)