nanog mailing list archives
Re: flat vs non-flat charging
From: "Kent W. England" <kwe () geo net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 12:01:15 -0700
Jerry Scharf <scharf () vix com> wrote:
I think the idea of distance charging is going away in many cases. ... Using archaic telephone pricing models to argue cost of providing bulk IP services is just not right.
I agree that using the regulated telephone network for Internet pricing doesn't make sense, but there is a difference developing on the Net between locally cached data and data that has to be fetched from a distance. I would not be surprised to find differential pricing being used to incent browsers to re-use locally cached data whenever possible. --Kent
Current thread:
- flat vs non-flat charging Jerry Scharf (May 29)
- RE: flat vs non-flat charging Bill St. Arnaud (May 29)
- Re: flat vs non-flat charging Richard Irving (May 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: flat vs non-flat charging Kent W. England (May 29)