nanog mailing list archives
flat vs non-flat charging
From: Jerry Scharf <scharf () vix com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 09:07:02 -0700
I think the idea of distance charging is going away in many cases. With WDM, the cost of the WDM and SONET eqiupment on the ends of a fully populated 32 channel per fiber, 144 strand pull vastly outweight end-to-end fiber costs of anything pulled through the ground. When you add routers and the like on top of that, the distance issue really goes away and it becomes on of network topology hops. Can anyone with figures for new intercontinental pulls say whether this is true there as well (project oxygen marketing claims this, but...)? Using archaic telephone pricing models to argue cost of providing bulk IP services is just not right. jerry
Current thread:
- flat vs non-flat charging Jerry Scharf (May 29)
- RE: flat vs non-flat charging Bill St. Arnaud (May 29)
- Re: flat vs non-flat charging Richard Irving (May 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: flat vs non-flat charging Kent W. England (May 29)