nanog mailing list archives

Re: Suggestion for improved identD


From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 13:19:41 +0800

Jon Lewis writes:
On Tue, 19 May 1998, Ehud Gavron wrote:

Suggestion:  PPP access devices intercept identD requests
             and return the authenticated access string.

Thoughts appreciated, as are comments, flames, blames, and anything
of some content.

Not every dialup connection is a single end luser on a win95 box.  What
about ISDN connections where there's a whole network of real computers and
different users (on each computer)?  How does the NAS decide which
connections to intercept for and which not to?  Even if you knew the
username, what good will it do you 1000 miles away?  Those providers who
care can fine the user if you tell them the IP and time of day.  Those who
don't care won't care if you tell them "I was spammed by
abc123 () yournets net".

Its more of blocking services.

When I implemented the forced ident setup, if a user had a static IP, then
the ident was passed through. Only if they were a dynamic IP dialup client
would the ident be forced.

The idea here is not to provide a username. Its to provide a method of
identifying a dialup user, in a way that doesn't change with each login.
Since most things already query ident, then why not go this path and make
ident 'trusted' on dynamic IP NAS connections?

Adrian




Current thread: