nanog mailing list archives

Re: Core router bakeoff?


From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 12:09:52 +0100

On Thu, 07 May 1998 17:36:45 -0400 
 "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com> wrote:

Bays software sucks, the ammount of hassle I've had with frame relay and
ATM with Bay is a nightmare.

The Ascend GRF-400 is an excellent choice.


Jon Green writes:
Wait.. a Bay BCN will push 1 Gb/s through the box,

Bay's have beautiful hardware architectures. The hardware is not the
problem.

but you are recommending a PC running GateD over a Bay router?

At the low end, sure. They're cheap as all hell, easy to remote
manage, easy to expand, and very efficient. With the right software,
they are pretty damn nice. Lots of NSPs use the things these days --
Daemon in the U.K. used to do nothing but BSD boxes last time I
checked.

Perry





--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.     
neil () DOMINO ORG    NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A>



Current thread: