nanog mailing list archives
Re: Core router bakeoff?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 17:33:03 -0400
Gregory Mirsky writes:
Perry, may I ask why you exclude Bay and 3Com? Any particular bad experience from the previous life?
I've only actually had bad experience with Bay stuff -- 3Com isn't even in the running for the most part -- the software doesn't even pretend to be able to do the job for a backbone.
And Rob, it you're building a backbone I'd add Ascend's GRF to the list.
Actually, I rather like the architecture of the GRF, though I must admit to have never tried one out. I've heard some good things and they might be worth a test or two. Perry
Current thread:
- Re: Core router bakeoff?, (continued)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jon Green (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Andrew Bangs (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Robert Sanders (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jon Green (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Neil J. McRae (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Joe Warren-Meeks (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Nathan Stratton (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Steve Sobol (May 08)