nanog mailing list archives
Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 13:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com> writes:Okay. Playing my usual devil's advocate role, please tell me what migration path lies beyond FDDI for faster connectivity?SM FDDI -> SM POS. Problem solved. Reuse your fibre, even.
*cough* Um, hate to have to raise an ugly bugaboo, but reusing the fibre isn't the problem; it's redesigning the whole network architecture from multidrop, ring based FDDI, to point-to-point POS connections. Or are you going to point out a cheap (~$100,000) SONET switch that will work as a relatively "drop-in" replacement for already installed DEC Gigaswitches? If you know of one, let me know, and I'll order a half dozen. Otherwise, there really isn't any multi-drop replacement for FDDI at this point.
Your inventive marketing friend, Sean.
Inventive, definitely. Practical, on the other hand... Matt
Current thread:
- FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Charles Sprickman (Feb 05)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Kent W. England (Feb 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Charles Sprickman (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Lewis Eatherton (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Dean Anderson (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Paul Ferguson (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Matthew Petach (Feb 08)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet David Lesher (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Dorn Hetzel (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Martin Hannigan (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Karl Denninger (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 06)
- Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet Deepak Jain (Feb 06)