nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: Scott Huddle <huddle () mci net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 11:00:35 -0400
At 07:49 AM 19980813 -0700, Robert Bowman wrote:
[...] Let's face the facts, BBN is only 1.85% of my traffic. By all accounts, we estimate to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic.
Source of data? -scott
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Charles Sprickman (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Neil J. McRae (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jon Lewis (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Charles Sprickman (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 13)
- What peering means [was Re: BBN Peering issues] Alex Bligh (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Scott Huddle (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Matt Sommer (Aug 14)
- FW: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Hank Nussbacher (Aug 15)
(Thread continues...)