nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 12:05:11 -0700
| I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX. If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and topology conventions. I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is what PX means. Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection. Are there others? If so, are they down or something? Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Bradley Dunn (Aug 12)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Dillon (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Steven J. Sobol (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Alex Bligh (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Charles Sprickman (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Neil J. McRae (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)