nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: Steve Meuse <smeuse () bbnplanet com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 14:05:04 -0500
At 09:11 AM 10/8/97 -0700, Michael Dillon wrote:
At this time I am receiving a ton of bogus routes originating from AS701. This AS has hijacked all the /24 subnets of 128.1 through 128.1xx. Since the
more
specific route prevails in the cidr world they have managed to wipe out my network 128.9.0.0 not to mention a hundred other 128.x networks.Isn't this the kind of problems that the Doran filters are supposed to
prevent?
I understand that it is not to everyone's benefit to filter on the /19 boundary like Sprint does but it seems to be prudent to adopt a /8 filter on most of the old class A space and a /16 filter on the old class B space. Other than the need to update these filters as the former class A space is subdivided I can see no major downside. Comments?
What about the cable providers that have chunks of 24/8? -Steve
Current thread:
- UUNet Routing SNAFU prue (Oct 07)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Dorian R. Kim (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU bmanning (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Dorian R. Kim (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Matt Ranney (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Dorian R. Kim (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Miquel van Smoorenburg (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mike Norris (Oct 09)