nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 14:46:57 -0800
Karl Denninger wrote:
We could, for example, define a "country code" set of bits in the high-order field of the "provider" area. For example, from the LEFT side of the IPv6 address (128 bits wide):
Have little experience in international networking, ain't we? Take Russian Internet for example: five largest ISPs all have separate dedicated links to _different_ European and North American backbones. This seems to be a typical picture all around the world. European connectivity is particularly convoluted. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Overloaded semantics (was Re: moving to IPv6), (continued)
- Re: Overloaded semantics (was Re: moving to IPv6) Thomas Narten (Nov 05)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phillip Vandry (Nov 05)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John A. Tamplin (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Gary E. Miller (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Winfried Haug (Nov 09)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Havard . Eidnes (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Paul A Vixie (Nov 01)