nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: woods () most weird com (Greg A. Woods)
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 13:21:32 -0500 (EST)
[ On Sat, November 1, 1997 at 11:28:40 (-0500), Bill Becker wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful The basic concepts about email have to change. The present system is hopelessly out of date.
I'm not so sure about that. There are a couple of silly points in the old RFCs (that are in danger of being re-instated in the new ones), but other than that we've got one of the most widely accepted mail transport protocols in use on the Internet (recent corporate IS trade rags are saying SMTP is the way to go, just as they finally did for TCP/IP). I'm not saying these guys should lead the pack, but they're usually pretty good thermometers. There are a whole bunch of popular mis-conceptions and incorrect perceptions about e-mail that we really do need to correct. -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <gwoods () acm org> <robohack!woods> Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods () weird com>
Current thread:
- Re: moving to IPv6, (continued)
- Re: moving to IPv6 John A. Tamplin (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Karl Denninger (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Gary E. Miller (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 07)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Winfried Haug (Nov 09)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 11)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Havard . Eidnes (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Paul A Vixie (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) bmanning (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Greg A. Woods (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Eric M. Carroll (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Paul A Vixie (Nov 01)
- Message not available
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 01)
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Paul A Vixie (Nov 01)
- Message not available
- Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Considered Harmful) Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 02)