nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering
From: Christopher Morrell <chrism () kerris com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 20:30:45 -0400
Deepak Jain wrote:
Isn't there some issue like MCI and Sprint not being at 4 common NAPs w/ UUNet?
I'm sure there are at least 4 points each where UUNET peers with MCI and Sprint. Whether the peering is done at a public peering point or not shouldn't make a difference. Obviously the need to peer is there, otherwise the two companies would not have agreed to spend the money to peer privately. Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- UUNET Press Release on Peering Kent W. England (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Karl Denninger (May 12)
- Peering and traffic and GST Paul R.D. Lantinga (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Michael S. Ramsey (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mike Kerr (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Michael S. Ramsey (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean Donelan (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Turner (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Prior (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Vadim Antonov (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Turner (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Pete Kruckenberg (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Hong Chen (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Pete Kruckenberg (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Karl Denninger (May 12)