nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering
From: Mike Kerr <mkerr () kerris com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 16:11:41 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 12 May 1997, Michael S. Ramsey wrote:
(may I suggest we move this to com-priv? The announcement was great on this list, but others might appreciate the discussion to be elsewhere)
I wouldn't. I don't want to subscribe to another list; besides, I find the subject matter extremely relevant as it raises some interesting issues of some importance to nanog. Mike. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- UUNET Press Release on Peering Kent W. England (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Karl Denninger (May 12)
- Peering and traffic and GST Paul R.D. Lantinga (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Michael S. Ramsey (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mike Kerr (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Michael S. Ramsey (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean Donelan (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Turner (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Prior (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Vadim Antonov (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Turner (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Pete Kruckenberg (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Hong Chen (May 12)