nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering
From: Christopher Morrell <chrism () kerris com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 19:45:04 -0400
Sean Donelan wrote:
DRA doesn't have large Web farms, but people build public libaries in the darndest places. I'm always amused by providers that have peering requirements their own networks, or existing 'peers' don't meet.
Do you feel that UUNET's own network doesn't meet the criteria set out in the press release? How so? Which of UUNET's peers who are able to continue to peer with them, would you say do not follow the criteria set out in the press release? Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- UUNET Press Release on Peering Kent W. England (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Karl Denninger (May 12)
- Peering and traffic and GST Paul R.D. Lantinga (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Michael S. Ramsey (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mike Kerr (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Michael S. Ramsey (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean Donelan (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Turner (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Christopher Morrell (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Prior (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Vadim Antonov (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Turner (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Pete Kruckenberg (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Hong Chen (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Pete Kruckenberg (May 12)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Karl Denninger (May 12)