nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: Jason Matthews <jason () broken net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 16:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 26 Jul 1997, Eric Germann wrote:
I have a university client with 1200 hosts on 4 subnets. Guess what they've got? A /16. % Utilization: 1.83% % Waste: 98.17% Folks thats 64334 addresses. And we try and jam clients in to blocks of 8 or 16 discrete addresses. Squatters rights I guess :) I've seriously thought of approaching them for their "quality" IP real estate which isn't in the swamp.
sdsu.edu has 2 /16 networks for 35,000 students faculty and staff. total usage on 146.244.0.0 is two machines. % utilization 0.00305 % waste 100% anyone else got a better example? j.
Current thread:
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?, (continued)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? rbenn (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Kim Hubbard (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Dean Gaudet (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Matthew Silvey (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Eric Germann (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Eric Germann (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Tim Gibson (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Eric Germann (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Randy Bush (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)
- Your mail to Jason Matthews <jason () broken net> jason (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Larry Vaden (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)