nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: Kim Hubbard <kimh () internic net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 16:24:09 -0400 (EDT)
I'm beginning to think there is a market for a device which has 1 Ethernet port and responds to any RANGE of addresses, so you can scam Internic into thinking you have 100% utilization of your address space, right off the bat...
Yeah, because the conservation of IP space only helps InterNIC - it doesn't help you or your customers or anyone else on the Internet. Let's just use up all the address space....that'll teach the InterNIC! Kim
Eric
Current thread:
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?, (continued)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gordon Mercer (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gabriel M. Schuyler (Jul 27)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? rbenn (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Kim Hubbard (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Dean Gaudet (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Matthew Silvey (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Tim Gibson (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Randy Bush (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)