nanog mailing list archives
RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?
From: root () gannett com
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:12:38 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Eric Germann wrote:
negates the whole purpose of multihoming from their perspective. Does Gannett or Pointcast have >= 8K hosts exposed on their DMZ networks?
No, but we have around 8K devices using our legal address space. Just because I don't currently expose my hosts doesn't mean I don't want the option to be able to. When we registered, firewalls weren't the up-and-coming thing, but then I've also got a /23 being routed via my AS. Most of that comes from the fact that my addresses are pre-CIDR customer registered ones. Once again, it's back to the whole aggragation of routes vs. disaggragation of traffic. There, now that I've used disaggragation in a sentence, I'll sit down and shut up. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson gatekeeper () gannett com
Current thread:
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing?, (continued)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gordon Mercer (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Alec H. Peterson (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Howard C. Berkowitz (Jul 24)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 24)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Gabriel M. Schuyler (Jul 27)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? rbenn (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Kim Hubbard (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Dean Gaudet (Jul 25)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Matthew Silvey (Jul 25)
- RE: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? root (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Tim Gibson (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Jason Matthews (Jul 26)
- Re: Non-ISP companies multi-homing? Randy Bush (Jul 26)