nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-profit IP Registry
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 18:22:04 -0500
At 02:58 PM 1/3/97 -0700, Wayne Bouchard wrote:
May I please point out that this discussion has not mentioned the wide scale implementation of IPv6 or some derrivative thereof. The greatly increased quantity of addresses should have some impact on this. Granted, for the sake of routing tables, some organization needs to manage the allocation so we don't end up with piecemeal routing but the restrictions on how many addresses folks can have should be lessened in such a circumstance.
What wide-scale implementation? - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry, (continued)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Marc Slemko (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David Schwartz (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Marc Slemko (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David R. Conrad (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Robert J. Fehn Sr. (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Alex.Bligh (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Joe Pace (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Wayne Bouchard (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Todd R. Stroup (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul Ferguson (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Thomas Narten (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 Internet Randall Atkinson (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Thomas Narten (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul Ferguson (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Owen DeLong (Jan 04)