nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-profit IP Registry
From: owen () DeLong SJ CA US (Owen DeLong)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 12:19:29 -0800
Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com> writes:May I please point out that this discussion has not mentioned the wide scale implementation of IPv6 or some derrivative thereof.What wide-scale implementation?Chose your words carefully. What major vendor is _not_ "implementing" IPv6? Be sure to check: http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-implementations.html http://www.research.microsoft.com/research/os/ Thomas
Wide scale IMPLEMENTATION is different from VENDOR DEVELOPMENT. I think the statement was more of "What wide-scale DEPLOYMENT" than saying that major vendors were not implementing. Owen - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry, (continued)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Robert J. Fehn Sr. (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Alex.Bligh (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Joe Pace (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Wayne Bouchard (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Todd R. Stroup (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul Ferguson (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Thomas Narten (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 Internet Randall Atkinson (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Thomas Narten (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul Ferguson (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Owen DeLong (Jan 04)