nanog mailing list archives
Re: Non-profit IP Registry
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 14:58:49 -0700 (MST)
As a customer I have no problem paying for /16s so long as you'll give me as many as I wish to buy. -- Eliot Lear [lear () sgi com]As a customer I feel the same. But this is precisely why addresses should never be sold. How do you expect some mom & pop business or individual to compete with billion dollar companies that don't blink at a $50K service charge. Joe Pace pace () honda com
May I please point out that this discussion has not mentioned the wide scale implementation of IPv6 or some derrivative thereof. The greatly increased quantity of addresses should have some impact on this. Granted, for the sake of routing tables, some organization needs to manage the allocation so we don't end up with piecemeal routing but the restrictions on how many addresses folks can have should be lessened in such a circumstance.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry, (continued)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Eric D. Madison (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David Stoddard (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Marc Slemko (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David Schwartz (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Marc Slemko (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry David R. Conrad (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Daryn D. Fisher (Jan 02)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Robert J. Fehn Sr. (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Alex.Bligh (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Joe Pace (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Wayne Bouchard (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Todd R. Stroup (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul Ferguson (Jan 03)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Thomas Narten (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 Internet Randall Atkinson (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Thomas Narten (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Paul Ferguson (Jan 04)
- Re: Non-profit IP Registry Owen DeLong (Jan 04)