nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ungodly packet loss rates
From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 10:17:37 -0700 (MST)
I'd say this is nitpicking, and my native language is "screaming really hard" although I've been taught Hebrew, English, and SCUBA Spanish. (That's enough Spanish to go to San Carlos to dive with :) At any rate, It's is a contraction for it is. The common disgusting method of assumig that 'cause it sounds 'kay we 'kin do it doesn't mean it's stands for it has. Specifically, Kevin, don't send me back to English class, pick up a large library-sized dictionary and ejamacate yourself. In any case, that has little to do with the whiny shit on nanog. Ehud - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates, (continued)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Billy Biggs (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Matthew Petach (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Jon Zeeff (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Craig A. Huegen (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Billy Biggs (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Michael Dillon (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Ehud Gavron (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Kevin Oberman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Avi Freedman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Kevin Oberman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Ehud Gavron (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Bill Manning (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Andrew Partan (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 22)