nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ungodly packet loss rates
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () cic net>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 22:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Billy Biggs wrote:
Looking for opinions here: Do I have the right, as a citizen of the internet, to phone up the NOC of another major provider to solve packet loss through their routers?
You should talk to your provider who should try resolution of problem with the provider in question. This is the only scalable way for this to work. Having various folks call up NOCs for various problem is pretty close to a nightmare scenario for someone who is concerned with NOC staffing and response time. The fact that this approach may current not work well means that we should fix the inter-provider cooperation, rather then routing around it by having end users call NOCs of providers. If this happened, I wouldn't be surprised to see NOC phone numbers becoming semi secret or requiring authentication. -dorian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates, (continued)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Michael Dillon (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Jon Zeeff (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Alan Hannan (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates bmanning (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Robert Bowman (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Robert Bowman (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Alan Hannan (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Billy Biggs (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Matthew Petach (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Jon Zeeff (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Craig A. Huegen (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Kevin Oberman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Avi Freedman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Kevin Oberman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Ehud Gavron (Oct 22)