Re: AGIS/DIGEX

[matthew () scruz net (Matthew Kaufman)]

This exact thought has occured to me. Fixed charges to peer at fewer
places. You can even come up with reasonable assumptions for fixed
charges. (like that people who peer at one coast but not the other are 
costing you some fraction of one direction of a coast-to-coast DS3, and 
ought to pay you about that much)

Perhaps if/when we end up at additional NAPs we'll implement this policy
ourselves.

-matthew kaufman
 matthew () scruz net

Original message <Pine.ULT.3.93.961030093058.20904H-100000 () halcyon halcyon com>
From: Ed Morin <edm () halcyon com>
Date: Oct 30,  9:32
Subject: Re: AGIS/DIGEX
> Maybe a peering agreement that has settlements based on the number of
> NAP's you peer at?  Peering at _no_ NAP's means paying full price with
> a decreasing scale down to nothing if you peer at 5 NAP's (or whatever
> the current hurdle is set at).
>
> Ed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -