nanog mailing list archives
Re: AGIS/DIGEX
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:42:21 -0500 (EST)
AGIS has made it a 5-NAP requirement - and the AADS and PacBell NAPs are not the easiest to get into on 1-day notice.What I heard them say was that you had to peer with them in every NAP where they were present...implying that if they go into a sixth NAP, their peering requirement increases. Mark Borchers
What I heard Peter say was something like "We've found that unless you are present at all of these NAPs reachability isn't good enough to you". Not that he precluded adding other XPs as requirements - but I didn't hear him say "you must be at every public XP that we're at". Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX, (continued)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Nathan Stratton (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Paul A Vixie (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Enke Chen (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Laughlin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Paul Ferguson (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX maillists (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Chris A. Icide (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Mark Borchers (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Pritish Shah (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Todd Graham Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) alex (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Michael Dillon (Oct 30)