nanog mailing list archives
Re: AGIS/DIGEX
From: Steve Noble <steve () exodus net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:40:01 -0800
At 10:36 AM 10/30/96 +0500, you wrote:
AGIS has made it a 5-NAP requirement - and the AADS and PacBell NAPs are not the easiest to get into on 1-day notice.What I heard them say was that you had to peer with them in every NAP where they were present...implying that if they go into a sixth NAP, their peering requirement increases.
actually peter said something about if you weren't at every nap they were at, there might be problems (or they have seen problems) getting traffic to/from you. That's kind of a scary (and unrealistic) thought imho to think that their/your/the internet is so unstable that out of 6 paths only 1 functions correctly. .-[ Steve Noble / Sr.Network Admin ]-. - Exodus Communications / steve () exodus net - - v(408)486-5024 / f(408)486-5001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX, (continued)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Chris A. Icide (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Mark Borchers (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Pritish Shah (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Todd Graham Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) alex (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Michael Dillon (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Mike Trest (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Steve Noble (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Matthew Kaufman (Oct 30)