nanog mailing list archives

Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI)

From: "Eric M. Carroll" <ericc () nds netsvc istar ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 19:42:18 -0500

Sean,

Ok, I will bite. Let's assume for a moment that dual DS3 is not
acceptible and I want IMUXed DS3s or a real optical interface. What do
you recommend for a Cisco?

ATM has the annoying advantage of having alot of people building for it.

Eric Carroll

Current thread:

Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI), (continued)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
    - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Fletcher Kittredge (Mar 29)
    - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Steve Steinberg (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Larry J. Plato (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Sean Doran (Mar 29)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Eric M. Carroll (Mar 29)
- RE: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 29)
- RE: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Vadim Antonov (Mar 29)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Sean Doran (Mar 29)
  - Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Eric M. Carroll (Mar 29)
- RE: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Bharat Ranjan (Mar 29)

(Thread continues...)