nanog mailing list archives
Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI)
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 01:32:34 -0500
At 12:49 AM 3/29/96 -0500, Shikhar Bajaj wrote:
Doesn't the fact that they recover the investment mean that enough people wanted the product and were willing to pay for it?
Not that I want to beat a dead horse here, but please explain to me how, if you consistently manage to only achieve 70%-80% effective throughput on available bandwidth, you can recoup your investment from subscribers who are expecting more? Somehow, this sounds quirky to me. ,-) - paul
Current thread:
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI), (continued)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Sean Doran (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Shikhar Bajaj (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Mike Trest (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Per Gregers Bilse (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Dorian Kim (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Curtis Villamizar (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Fletcher Kittredge (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) @NANOG-LIST (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Steve Steinberg (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Larry J. Plato (Mar 29)
- Re: SONET Interconnect (was RE: MCI) Eric M. Carroll (Mar 29)