nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interconnects at NANOG
From: salo () msc edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 13:58:14 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 1996 12:03:48 -0700 (MST) From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM> Subject: Re: Interconnects at NANOG To: srh () merit edu Cc: nanog () merit edu, GAVRON () ACES COM Can we agree that there's no longer any difference between MAE, NAP, and Interconnect? [with the exception of ``the four priority NAPs''] Nit: Tucson has the C before the S...
It is probably still appropriate to use the term "NAP" to refer to those interconnect points which are sponsored by the NSF under solicitation 93-52. The solicitation specifies the duties of a NAP Manager organization; read it for details. I believe that the NSF has three or four contracts (Cooperative Agreements to be more precise) in place with NAP Managers for the Sprint, MFS, Ameritech and PacBell NAPs. (I don't know whether Ameritech and PacBell are one or two Cooperative Agreements, although it is probably easy to look it up.) -tjs
Current thread:
- Interconnects at NANOG Susan R. Harris (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Ehud Gavron (Jan 03)
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Tim Salo (Jan 03)
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Stan Barber (Jan 03)
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Dave Siegel (Jan 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Jonathan Heiliger (Jan 03)
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Bill Manning (Jan 03)
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Jeffrey Burgan (Jan 03)
- Re: Interconnects at NANOG Dave Siegel (Jan 03)