nanog mailing list archives
Re: 208/8 announcements
From: Dave Siegel <dsiegel () rtd com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 12:43:47 -0700 (MST)
I am under the impression that the 208/8 network has not yet been assigned to anyone. It appears we are only up to 207.19/16. However, as someone (Avi?) pointed out earlier: | Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path | *>i208.0.1.0 192.35.171.34 1 50 0 3561 1280 3847 ? | *>i208.0.4.0 192.35.171.34 1 50 0 3561 1280 3847 ?
Well, it looks like a fat finger to me...I see that 207.0 - 207.3 is assigned to MCI. I'll be the client was allocated these out of 207 instead of 208, and just mistyped them. Dave -- Dave Siegel President, RTD Systems & Networking, Inc. (520)623-9663 Network Engineer -- Regional/National NSPs (Cisco) dsiegel () rtd com User Tracking & Acctg -- "Written by an ISP, http://www.rtd.com/~dsiegel/ for an ISP."
Current thread:
- 208/8 announcements Alan Hannan (Jan 02)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Rob Skrobola (Jan 02)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Avi Freedman (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Alan Hannan (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Avi Freedman (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Dave Siegel (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Rob Skrobola (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Paul A Vixie (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Avi Freedman (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Rob Skrobola (Jan 02)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Dave Siegel (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 208/8 announcements Sean Doran (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Rob Skrobola (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements Mike (Jan 03)
- Re: 208/8 announcements bmanning (Jan 04)