nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd)
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:29:37 -0500
At 11:01 PM 2/11/96 -0800, Robert Du Gaue wrote:
No circularity about it. First, you need customers. Second, if you already have enough customers, you get your own IP space. Until then, you get a small chunk out of somebody else's bigger IP space.Yeah right. You try that with a growing business. Then when you finally get enough users and corporate customers to 'justify' your own 64block and then give them the news that their entire networks will now need to be reconfigured how do you think they'll react. If I was that big, the amount of money it would cost me and my end-users would not be trivial.
Creating a consortium [akin to the NAP model] of small ISP's could easily resolve this problem, if all address space allocated to each ISP was contiguous and could be aggregated to a larger prefix. This has been suggested on numerous occasions. - paul
Current thread:
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Robert Du Gaue (Feb 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) William Allen Simpson (Feb 11)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Craig A. Huegen (Feb 11)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) William Allen Simpson (Feb 11)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Robert Du Gaue (Feb 11)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) mike (Feb 12)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 12)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Jonathan Heiliger (Feb 12)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Alan B. Clegg (Feb 15)
- larger space was: Re: [NIC-.... Carl Payne (Feb 15)
- Re: larger space was: Re: [NIC-.... Alan B. Clegg (Feb 15)
- Re: larger space was: Re: [NIC-.... Carl Payne (Feb 15)
- Low quality ISPs (was Re: larger space was: Re: [NIC-.... ) Curtis Villamizar (Feb 16)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Michael Dillon (Feb 15)
- Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be) Alan B. Clegg (Feb 15)
- Re: Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be) Michael Dillon (Feb 15)
- Re: Cooperation between *SMALL* ISPs (not the way I want it to be) mike (Feb 16)