nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd)


From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:29:37 -0500

At 11:01 PM 2/11/96 -0800, Robert Du Gaue wrote:

No circularity about it.  First, you need customers.  Second, if you
already have enough customers, you get your own IP space.

Until then, you get a small chunk out of somebody else's bigger IP space.

Yeah right. You try that with a growing business. Then when you finally
get enough users and corporate customers to 'justify' your own 64block and
then give them the news that their entire networks will now need to be
reconfigured how do you think they'll react. If I was that big, the amount
of money it would cost me and my end-users would not be trivial. 


Creating a consortium [akin to the NAP model] of small ISP's could
easily resolve this problem, if all address space allocated to each
ISP was contiguous and could be aggregated to a larger prefix.

This has been suggested on numerous occasions.

- paul



Current thread: