nanog mailing list archives
Re: Customer AS
From: "Chris MacFarland" <chris () computek net>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 09:34:40 -0500
Jon Zeeff wrote:
Isn't this the provider that says that dual-homing to them (ie, not to another provider) should always be adequate?
Yep this is sprintlink. Sprint has been having route flapping problems for the past 3 days. Their NOC and engineers have been unable to pinpoint it. The master ticket from customer maintenance 6554885 said the cause was IS-IS routing problems.
As a sprintlink customer I can say that today was from hell. Couldn't reach *any* of the root nameservers for about 2-3 hours, of course
before > >I
discovered it was a sprintlink problem I killed and restarted named
thus
loosing my cache :-( and things still aren't back to normal. NOC said
that
they were having major "route-flapping" problems, and were trying to determine the source of the problem. I hope they've figured it out.
You were lucky. Looking at my routing table shows the majority of the routes from sprintlink to be about 6 hours old. This is best I have seen in the past few days. Most of the time the routes from them have been less than 20 minutes old. Chris MacFarland CompuNet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Customer AS, (continued)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Vadim Antonov (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Curtis Villamizar (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Perry E. Metzger (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Rob Skrobola (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Perry E. Metzger (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Henry Kilmer (Aug 21)
- Re: Customer AS Michael Dillon (Aug 26)