nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role
From: avg () postman ncube com (Vadim Antonov)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:59:38 +0800
Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com> wrote:
Unless they have a real plan & need to get about 128 buildings full of 100 machines/building online, it's a lost cause. You already need a /18 to be heard from Sprint in >= 207/8. Unless you're a customer of Sprint.
And if you're a customer of Sprint you'll get aggregated in something like /14. The proxy/firewall solution for schools is probably the best. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role, (continued)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Howard C. Berkowitz (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role PIER (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Paul Ferguson (Apr 04)
- 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Suzanne Woolf (Apr 05)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Howard C. Berkowitz (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role PIER (Apr 04)
- RE: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Jim Fleming (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Mike O'Dell (Apr 04)
- RE: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Jim Fleming (Apr 04)
- RE: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Vadim Antonov (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Curtis Villamizar (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role rboivie (Apr 05)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Howard C. Berkowitz (Apr 04)