nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role
From: Tim Bass (PIER) <pier () dune silkroad com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 11:04:54 -0500 (EST)
Howard states: [ ... ]
IMHO, I don't think you can guarantee that almost anything will stay routable, certainly anything less than an /18. Bluntly, there's no good way to guarantee routable prefixes.
Yes, there is a good way to GUARANTEE routable prefixes. Intermediate system address translation which maps to "virtual renumbering".... The answer my friend.... is blowing in the wind... in the technical implementation, not "human attitude re-engineering"..... The attitude, .... "bluntly, there's no good way for man to fly...." is not unique to written history.... it is alive and well in the Internet today ;-) Best Regards, Tim
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role, (continued)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Paul A Vixie (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Craig A. Huegen (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Dalvenjah FoxFire (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Avi Freedman (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Avi Freedman (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Christopher E. Stefan (Apr 07)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role PIER (Apr 04)
- 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Suzanne Woolf (Apr 05)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role PIER (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Mike O'Dell (Apr 04)
- RE: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Curtis Villamizar (Apr 04)