nanog mailing list archives
Re: Address "portability"
From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin () erols com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 18:39:58 -0500
At 12:32 PM 4/5/96 -0800, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
The California PUC has approved local phone competition within California, with the requirement the phone number portability (between carriers) be fully implemented as soon as possible. Making your phone number stay the same no matter whether you're a PacBell or MFS or TCI customer is exactly the same problem as making IP addresses portable... just wait until ISPs are regulated, and they get the same mandate.
Uhm, Cisco, you hear that? Justin Newton * You have to change just to stay caught up. Internet Architect * Erol's Internet Services *
Current thread:
- Re: Address "portability", (continued)
- Re: Address "portability" bmanning (Apr 07)
- Re: Address "portability" Erik-Jan Bos (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Mike O'Dell (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 06)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Andrew Smith (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Jerry Scharf (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Vadim Antonov (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Justin W. Newton (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- Re: Address "portability" Paul Ferguson (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Jeremy Porter (Apr 05)