nanog mailing list archives
Re: Address "portability"
From: Erik-Jan Bos <erik-jan.bos () surfnet nl>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 21:00:47 +0200
Peter,
What is the general consensus of this group regarding the "portability" of addresses in the 204/8 and 205/8 range?Portable addresses is an illusion, as it does no scale. Give me a call when you convinced the phone_company to make my phone number work in California.
Maybe this is considered poorman's portability, but: When I take my GSM-phone to Hong Kong (or to Stockholm) my grandmother is still able to give me a call while I am there on the same number as when I am at home... Address portability at work... __ Erik-Jan.
Current thread:
- Re: Address "portability" Peter Lothberg (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" bmanning (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Address "portability" Erik-Jan Bos (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Mike O'Dell (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 06)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Andrew Smith (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Jerry Scharf (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Vadim Antonov (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Matthew Kaufman (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Justin W. Newton (Apr 05)
- Re: Address "portability" Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
(Thread continues...)