nanog mailing list archives
Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
The AUP won't have much effect, but the after-effects will. Once the AUP is announced we will get press coverage about it, any new Internet books and articles will point out the rules of conduct on the Internet and mention that breaking the rules could get you kicked out. All this will make people aware that there ARE rules and that spam is not liked. Publicity, publicity and more publicity.
I've seen near zero coverage of RFC 1746, which covers AUP's on the Internet.
Besides, I believe ISOC has been working on a code of conduct for almost a year. I recall reading about it last fall somewhere at http://www.isoc.org
Does it cover the issues listed in RFC 1746? Is anyone at ISOC paying any attention?
Michael Dillon Voice: +1-604-546-8022 Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-542-4130 http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael () memra com
--bill
Current thread:
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP, (continued)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Forrest W. Christian (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Theodore Ts'o (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Havard . Eidnes (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Vadim Antonov (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jeff . Ogden (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Barry Shein (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Bill Woodcock (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Catherine Anne Foulston (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP rboivie (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William B. Norton (Oct 17)