nanog mailing list archives
Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP
From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc () imach com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 10:38:37 -0600 (MDT)
On Mon, 16 Oct 1995, William Allen Simpson wrote:
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso () MIT EDU> I disagree, strongly. I think anti-spam messages, sent to the postmasters of the respective ISP's that provide service to the spammers, is perfectly acceptable. Otherwise, there is no cost to the ISP's for providing service to the spammers.Good idea! I've only been sending to the perpetrator (which sometimes bounces).
Heres a better solution: Only send to the postmasters. I was involved (from the "bouncing site" perspective) with a spam in which the perpetrator would have been charged with felonies in at least two states. However, the internet community tipped the individual off by determining his email address and sending him email cc'd to the postmaster of the site. As a result, the perpetrator wasn't caught in the act, and a case could not be built. forrestc () imach com
Current thread:
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP, (continued)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 15)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bcurnow (Oct 15)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Justin Newton (Oct 17)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP George Herbert (Oct 15)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Philip J. Nesser (Oct 15)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 15)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Henry W. Miller (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William B. Norton (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Forrest W. Christian (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Tim Bass (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Forrest W. Christian (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Theodore Ts'o (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Havard . Eidnes (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Vadim Antonov (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jeff . Ogden (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Barry Shein (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Bill Woodcock (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)