nanog mailing list archives
Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP
From: rboivie () VNET IBM COM
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 95 16:56:21 EDT
In discussing spamming problems "William B. Norton" <wbn () merit edu> wrote:
I personally think slightly smarter exploders might go a long way. For example: ... 2) an exploder that "suspends" messages with more than, say 6 lists and newsgroups, and notifies the sender. If the sender is not a real address, it automatically is purged.
But wouldn't a spammer just defeat this measure by using a shell script, say. Instead of sending one message to n lists, a script could easily send n messages each addressed to a single list. Rick Boivie rboivie () vnet ibm com
Current thread:
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP, (continued)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Havard . Eidnes (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Vadim Antonov (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Jeff . Ogden (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Barry Shein (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Bill Woodcock (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP bmanning (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Catherine Anne Foulston (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP Michael Dillon (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William Allen Simpson (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP rboivie (Oct 16)
- Re: Motion for a new POST NSF AUP William B. Norton (Oct 17)