nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Dave Siegel <dsiegel () net99 net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 1995 18:03:40 -0700 (MST)
Does that mean that all the internet registries no longer allocate /24 (or longer) prefixes that have nothing to do with the actual Internet topology (these prefixes aka "portable addresses") ? Perhaps folks from various Internet registries would be able to answer this question.I assign /22s to ISPs. When they use them up I give them another /22. Private companies that show a need for a /24 are assigned a /24.Ah. here is the rub. When you ISP buddies come back, you should ask them to return the origianal /22 for a /20. That way, the total size of the routing system stays the same!
And every time they need to expand, even using the same provider, they have to renumber their whole network? I sincerely hope that was sarcasm I detected in your post... Dave -- Dave Siegel Director of Engineering, Net99 http://www.webcity.com/ (602)249-1083 24x7 NOC line http://www.rtd.com/~dsiegel/ (520)318-0696 My Tucson Office
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ David J. Schmidt (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jon Zeeff (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Gary Wright (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Curtis Villamizar (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Arnold Nipper (Aug 18)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)