nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Hank Nussbacher <HANK () taunivm tau ac il>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 95 00:24:30 IST
On Wed, 16 Aug 95 13:09:52 PDT you said:
Paul,New allocations are (as of 1466bis) being done through providers, on CIDRized lines. Whether IPv4 or IPv6, new allocations are not going to badly impact the core routing table size.Does that mean that all the internet registries no longer allocate /24 (or longer) prefixes that have nothing to do with the actual Internet topology (these prefixes aka "portable addresses") ? Perhaps folks from various Internet registries would be able to answer this question.
I assign /22s to ISPs. When they use them up I give them another /22. Private companies that show a need for a /24 are assigned a /24.
Yakov.
Hank
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ David J. Schmidt (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ David J. Schmidt (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Jon Zeeff (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Gary Wright (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Curtis Villamizar (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Arnold Nipper (Aug 18)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Dave Siegel (Aug 17)