nanog mailing list archives
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 17:54:09 -0400
In message <m0s3HEw-00030bC () rip psg com>, Randy Bush writes:
To move along an other tangent... What is the general wisdom on putting pull-ups on route annoucements to deter route flap? Vadim kindly gave me a static Null 250 hack to keep announcement up even if the source of the route drops it. Hence, you won't get the !H until you get to our border. Los pobre packitos will travel all the way and then get whacked. Seems to subvert one interpretation one could read into the intent of BGP. randy
Most people consider this to be a good thing for single homed destinations. An occasional TCP SYN travels the net and then goes nowhere, but that's a small price to pay. Curtis
Current thread:
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?, (continued)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Eric M. Carroll (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Michael F. Nittmann (Apr 24)
- pull-ups on route annoucements to deter route flap Alan Barrett (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Andrew Partan (Apr 24)
- Why Vadim likes statics bmanning (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Eric M. Carroll (Apr 24)
- BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) Sean Doran (Apr 24)
- Re: BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) bmanning (Apr 25)
- Re: BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) Paul A Vixie (Apr 25)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Brett Watson (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Paul A Vixie (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 29)