nanog mailing list archives
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
From: randy () psg com (Randy Bush)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 95 09:25 PDT
For DNS to be usable, folks have to permit TCP DNS to work. I know of some service providers that filter TCP DNS connections. UDP packets are not big enough for many responses from an whois-type request.
Good point. As an addendum, those wishing to prevent zone transfers can use BIND's xfernets control to achieve this, and thus allow large responses while inhibiting undesired zone transfers. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?, (continued)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Andrew Partan (Apr 24)
- Why Vadim likes statics bmanning (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Eric M. Carroll (Apr 24)
- BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) Sean Doran (Apr 24)
- Re: BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) bmanning (Apr 25)
- Re: BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) Paul A Vixie (Apr 25)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Brett Watson (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Paul A Vixie (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 29)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Alan Hannan (Apr 29)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Paul Traina (Apr 29)