nanog mailing list archives
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
From: asp () uunet uu net (Andrew Partan)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 12:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
What happens if you do this and the target is multihomed? As long as you don't violate the integrity of the alternate paths, nobody is going to complain (and some will bless you).
If the target is multihomed, then you are doing BGP with the target and the target is responsible for making sure that his routes don't flap unnecessarily. If the target is singly homed, then the routes to that target should not flap. Whats the problem? --asp () uunet uu net (Andrew Partan)
Current thread:
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?, (continued)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Vadim Antonov (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Sean Doran (Apr 23)
- IAP Guidebook - help from the big guys Rich Roth (Apr 26)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Hank Nussbacher (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 11111111? Paul A Vixie (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Eric M. Carroll (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Michael F. Nittmann (Apr 24)
- pull-ups on route annoucements to deter route flap Alan Barrett (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Karl Denninger, MCSNet (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Andrew Partan (Apr 24)
- Why Vadim likes statics bmanning (Apr 24)
- Re: Why Vadim likes statics Eric M. Carroll (Apr 24)
- BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) Sean Doran (Apr 24)
- Re: BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) bmanning (Apr 25)
- Re: BGP vs. static routing (Re: Why Vadim likes statics) Paul A Vixie (Apr 25)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Curtis Villamizar (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1? Brett Watson (Apr 24)