Metasploit mailing list archives
An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist
From: rhyskidd at gmail.com (Rhys Kidd)
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:51:46 +0800
IMHO, I think the current system works quite well. msf-dev's are happy to accept contributions or submissions from the user community, and as has been seen in the past and my own experience, it usually doesn't take a great deal of time for one to be vetted and included in the SVN tree if it is of high quality. Of course nothing stops you from copy'ing in a public submission first had, giving it a cursory check over to make sure it's not doing anything odd, etc. By creating a second teir repository, I feel it'd lessen the collaborative atmosphere, as user's might feel their code isn't treated at the same level as core sections. While the open source nature means a resourceful community member could provide patches for any module category, it's usually the exploits section that benefits most from a larger base of skilled writers creating functional 'sploits. Anything which might dampen the efforts of these contributors should be thought about closely..
Current thread:
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Dennis Günnewig (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Rory Garton Smith (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Rhys Kidd (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Dennis Günnewig (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist H D Moore (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Dennis Günnewig (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Rhys Kidd (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Rory Garton Smith (Feb 04)
- An extra repository for exploits got by mailinglist Dennis Günnewig (Feb 04)