Interesting People mailing list archives
Will on-line backup be evil, too?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:35:41 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "David Lesher" <wb8foz () panix com> Date: March 26, 2009 1:59:24 PM EDT To: dave () farber net (David Farber) Subject: Will on-line backup be evil, too? Prof. F: I'm looking at a program called CrashPlan; it allows you to make Blowfish-encrypted backups to a variety of locations: a second local drive, another machine on your LAN, a machine elsewhere in the world, or storage rented from them. It's interesting in that it looks to be well thought out, has M$, Mac, Linux, and OpenSolaris versions, and flexible. (And free, in home versions...) Besides all the core issues of on-line backup storage, [Is their encryption & key management solid, what happens if they fail either technically or fiscally, will you even know if the Feebees/MPAA hit them with a NSL, etc..], another came to mind. It hammers on your upstream connection, at least during the initial seeding stage. That got me wondering. Will Comcast and friends label such as dangerous; and start deploying measures to sabotage it and its competitors as they did with Peer-to-Peer?I can hear the arguments now. "We never designed our system for this kind
of abuse." [Read "Someone else is making money we want."]. And maybe "It's enabling terrorists.." etc. etc. But what it really amounts to is: may we use our upstream bandwidth or not? ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)