Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too?
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:05:32 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Geoff Kuenning <geoff () cs hmc edu> Date: March 27, 2009 12:46:05 PM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: notsp Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too?
It hammers on your upstream connection, at least during the initial seeding stage. That got me wondering. Will Comcast and friends label such as dangerous; and start deploying measures to sabotage it and its competitors as they did with Peer-to-Peer?
In other news, a startup called onlive.com (disclosure: several of my ex-students work there) announced a streaming gaming system that would appear to be equally bandwidth-hungry. This reminds me of the 80's, when people started making heavy use of dialup modems. That played havoc with the the phone companies' statistical assumptions about how long phone calls lasted. They tried various ways of punishing customers who stayed online for long periods, but eventually recognized that another approach was needed and deployed technologies like ISDN and DSL. In the long term, Comcast and everybody else, including our very vocal Brett Glass, will be forced to reevaluate their hardware needs. That may lead to pricing changes, of course. -- Geoff Kuenning geoff () cs hmc edu http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~geoff/ Statistics don't bore people, people bore people. ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)
- Re: Will on-line backup be evil, too? David Farber (Mar 27)